I agree, and I don't see how its hypocritical to run an aftermarket HID kit but object to driving a RHD car with LHD headlights.

Yes, HID kits are illegal. I never disputed this. However it is not at all difficult to adjust them so they do not blind oncoming drivers, whilst still providing an above-standard level of light on the road.

Incorrectly matched headlights however, can not be simply "adjusted" to not blind oncoming drivers, unless you are satisfied with a 2cm illumination patch on the ground in front of you.

So basically, yes, both are illegal. However one is far more unsafe than the other. Feel free to enlighten me as to why its hypocritical to find an illegal yet safe headlight acceptable, but to find an illegal AND unsafe headlight unacceptable.

MY02B4 wrote:

errr WTF did this thread start?

blak_b4 wrote:

OR:
A thinly vieled guise to get someone else to buy the beers..

zerott wrote:

:suicide:

XXB4XX wrote:

Yes my HID's are defect-able, but at the end of the day, I could care less!!, Standard cars can be defected from factory.. so my measly HID's are the least of my worries.

Keep digging, mate.......

i want links to this bitch session.



stat.

http://www.ozliberty.com/forums/showthr … amp;page=3


was it that hard to link?


my synopsis of the matter:
dylanf and XoN - you guys need to show a little more respect towards Kenan. He's been tweaking his gen2 around about the time you two were counting pubes and rubbing one off to Britney Spears (or Justin Timberlake). Despite you two getting your knickers up your keischters something royal, you two gang up on him and have your little hissy fit about HIDs.


Seriously. Grow up. He has his opinion, you two share yours. You two should be ashamed of yourselves.

+1 for thread lock.


Definately the case of the pot calling the kettle black.



And to think I got excited about a good forum discussion, it turned out to be a 12 year old female equivalent of a slapfest.......I was disappointed.


p.s: these measely forums aren't what I would call a club. I lol'd hard when that was mentioned.

p.s.s: kenan...RSLC FTW.

p.s.s.s: hai brendan

LOL @ I'm too good for this club.

for this to be a club, it needs to be registered.

for it to be registered, it needs financial members.

and for that, you need a president, a treasurer, and other significant members.

need monthly meets.

annual general meetings

public liability insurance.....





and so on.

so hence, the Ozliberty.com forums are not what I would call a club. (I call a spade, a spade.)

dylan - if you believe I'm not contributing here, then I urge you to search for my threads in various technical sections.

don't start bitching at me, bitch!

as for beef. i like beef.


medium rare.


this thread is gheyness magnified X50000

dylanf wrote:

ROFL dang that post was good. Well yeh you're correct about the club thing, I wasn't aware the title `club` involved all that but thank you
Nawww alex you should know i love you and your posts give me mucho laughs (yes like macho man but less homo) and I know your wares and knowledge is beneficial to most if not all pee pee ells here.
Now come on gimme a hug

Thought id whore this before it got locked....
umm..

dylanf wrote:

But i still want to touch you alex.

SOO081 wrote:

LOL @ I'm too good for this club.

for this to be a club, it needs to be registered.

for it to be registered, it needs financial members.

and for that, you need a president, a treasurer, and other significant members.

need monthly meets.

annual general meetings

public liability insurance.....