Economic driving styles
15 posts
Economic driving styles |
|
|
by aurelius on 03-11-08 10:20 PM Is it economical to accelerate slow to 60, shifting at 2k rpm or accelerate at a more normal pace, max shift at 3k rpm? |
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by hawks123 on 04-11-08 05:57 AM 2 k! How long does it take you to get 60? |
|
|
If it's Broke, Use a Cable Tie. |
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by WaspHunter on 04-11-08 07:19 AM I figure keeping the car as close to the torque peak as possible while accelerating would work best for economy.
|
|
|
G. Castillo |
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by smythie on 04-11-08 08:57 AM This morning I tried a little experiment. Didn't know this thread was up though |
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by aurelius on 04-11-08 10:54 AM
Isn't peak at like 4k though? Seems a bit risque. If I speed it probably shifts at 4k and thats been getting me terrible economy. I'll try at 3k and see what happens. I only do it when there's nobody behind me. Takes quite a while... |
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by befour on 04-11-08 11:24 AM I think the best way is to make sure you aren't loading the engine to high hell in high gears while going slow, sometimes early shifting can be terrible for econemy because you then have to use more throttle in the next gear up to get it accelerating at a decent pace. |
|
|
"6"If You Want More Inch's, Stroke It
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by WaspHunter on 04-11-08 03:24 PM
3600 I think. I pay more attention to driving smoothly through the traffic than trying to move off at a certain rate. |
|
|
G. Castillo |
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by aaronc on 04-11-08 04:30 PM Ive found that the best way to increase economy is to drive smoothly - not slow or at set shift points, just be smooth. I find that increasing the throttle with rpm rather than stomping on the pedal or being a nana and not providing enough pedal to be the most effective. Also increasing brake pressure the more the car slows rather than lightly braking over a longer distance or braking at the last minute works well. I get about 8-9l per 100km out of my tt when i drive like this. |
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by DreamarT on 04-11-08 08:12 PM i usually change up each gear at 3,000rpm car seems to like it used to do 3,500rpm but would be nearly screaming at me most ive ever punched is 4,500 & it was screaming then spose doing 80 in 3rd then 4th-5th(going up to 100).
|
|
|
[color="Blue"]"4"[/color]
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by Bumpty on 04-11-08 08:50 PM Out of my 2.2 auto,
|
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by Metalwagon on 13-11-08 06:31 PM Neutral down hills! |
|
|
5
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by 02SE on 13-11-08 06:35 PM This thread is full of fail. Go buy a Prius. |
|
|
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by hawks123 on 15-11-08 08:51 AM
I've heard that leaving it in gear going down a hill uses no petrol. While in neutral the car is using petrol to idle. The movement of the car is turning the motor over. The amount the engine is reving does not translate directly to the amount of fuel being used |
|
|
If it's Broke, Use a Cable Tie. |
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by Metalwagon on 15-11-08 05:22 PM
oh wow thats heaps interesting.. ill quit the silly idea then |
|
|
5
|
Re: Economic driving styles |
|
|
by smythie on 16-11-08 08:57 AM it does depend on the type of transmission too. I wouldn't be surprised if, downhill, an auto is actually just as economical in neutral as in drive. Bloody torque converters. Manuals however (in particular newer EFI vehicles) will use next to no fuel when engine braking |
|
|
|
- Index
- » Off Topic
- » General Discussions
- » Economic driving styles





